Metrics Performance
Objective 1: Does the allocation increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner?
Metric 1a.1: Do jurisdictions with the most expensive housing costs receive a significant percentage of their RHNA as lower-income units?
Metric 1a.2: Do jurisdictions with the most expensive housing costs receive a share of the region's housing need that is at least proportional to their share of the region's households?
Objective 2: Does the allocation promote infill development and socioeconomic equity, the protection of environmental and agricultural resources, the encouragement of efficient development patterns, and the
achievement of the region’s greenhouse gas reductions targets?
Metric 2a: Do jurisdictions with the largest share of the region’s jobs have the highest growth rates resulting from RHNA?
Metric 2b: Do jurisdictions with the largest share of the region’s Transit Priority Area acres have the highest growth rates resulting from RHNA?
Metric 2c: Do jurisdictions with the lowest vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per resident have the highest growth rates resulting from RHNA?
Objective 3: Does the allocation increase the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability in all cities and counties within the region in an equitable manner?
Metric 3a.1: Do jurisdictions with the most low-wage workers per housing unit affordable to low-wage workers receive a significant percentage of their RHNA as lower-income units?
Metric 3a.2: Do jurisdictions with the most low−wage workers per housing units affordable to low−wage workers receive a share of the region's housing need that is at least proportional to their share of the region's households?
Objective 4: Does the allocation direct a lower proportion of housing need to an income category when a jurisdiction already has a disproportionately high share of households in that income category?
Metric 4a: Do jurisdictions with the largest percentage of high-income residents receive a larger share of their RHNA as lower-income units than jurisdictions with the largest percentage of low-income residents?
Objective 5: Does the allocation affirmatively further fair housing?
Metric 5a.1: Do jurisdictions with the largest percentage of households living in High or Highest Resource tracts receive a significant percentage of their RHNA as lower-income units?
Metric 5a.2: Do jurisdictions with the largest percentage of households living in High or Highest Resource tracts receive a share of the region's housing need that is at least proportional to their share of the region's
households?
Metric 5b: Do jurisdictions exhibiting racial and economic exclusion receive a share of the region's housing need at least proportional to their share of the region’s households?
Metric 5d.1: Do jurisdictions exhibiting racial and economic exclusion above the regional average receive a total share of the region's very low− and low−income housing need that is at least proportional to their total
share of the region's households?
Metric 5d.2: Does each jurisdiction exhibiting racial and economic exclusion above the regional average receive a share of the region's very low− and low−income housing need that is at least proportional to its share of
the region's households?